Ian Clifford, a man who has been on leave since 2008, lodged a complaint against his company Due to no increase in years on leave, It was in September 2008 when he introduced his first sick leave at the technology company where he works. This remained the case until, years later, in 2013, he filed a complaint to improve their working conditions,
The company proposed a settlement in which he was included in the disability plan of the American multinational company. that he could not be fired or had an obligation to go to work, According to the case report, he didn’t just offer her that, because he also They paid him around 10,000 Euros as compensation. For your complaints about holiday pay. Furthermore, it was agreed to never file complaints about the same problems again.
This means that Clifford is subject to the aforesaid scheme. This includes giving 75% of the agreed benefits to the employees till their recovery, retirement or death. For the salary of this employee, he had agreed to 72,037 pounds (about 82,000 euros), which As of 2013, he started earning around 61,500 Euros per year After 25% off.
He criticized his company for not increasing his salary.
Notwithstanding these conditions that the Company Granted, the worker believed the health plan the company covered was “not generous enough.” Since their salary tends to decrease over time as a result of inflation. Following his dissatisfaction, he filed a complaint in February last year taking the company to a labor court for alleged discrimination on grounds of disability.
However, the plans did not turn out as the man expected and The court eventually rejected his claim., Paul Housego, the judge in charge of the case, ruled that the worker had received “very substantial benefits” and “favorable treatment”. Furthermore, he said that, in this case, Absence of pay raise is not about discrimination,