Australia is seeking to launch its Covid-1 vaccine for children under the age of five amid controversy over the benefits of vaccinating young children who are at “extremely low” risk of developing severe symptoms from Covid-1.
Health Minister Greg Hunt on Tuesday invited Pfizer to seek approval from Australia’s medical regulator for a vaccine trial for children aged five to 11.
In a letter to Pfizer’s managing directors in Australia and New Zealand, Hunt suggested that the Jab manufacturer should apply to the Therapeutic Products Administration in parallel with its U.S. application.
Hunt writes, “I am pleased at your advice that Pfizer vaccine tests are showing promise in children under 12 years of age.”
“Vaccination will begin as a priority if the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunization approves immunization at this age.”
Chief Nursing Officer Alison Macmillan said it would be possible to vaccinate young children this year if regulators gave the green light.
On Monday, Pfizer announced the first results from a landmark trial of the Covid-1 vaccine among 2,28 participants between the ages of five and 11.
The vaccine manufacturer reports that young children have a “strong neutral antibody response” and “strong immunity” one month after the second dose, but noted that “the vaccine cannot protect everyone.”
Advantages vs. Risks
However, some experts have questioned whether the benefits of the Covid-1 vaccine outweigh the risks for children. High incidence of adverse events among vaccinated individuals And there is growing evidence that children are less likely to die from a serious illness or covid-1 than adults, as seen in several large studies in the UK.
As of 21 September, of all Covid-1 cases in Australia, about 11 per cent of children aged 0-9 and 13.4 per cent of children aged 10-19, no deaths were reported among children under 10.
In those infected, the symptoms usually last no longer than 12 weeks, according to a study published in The Journal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases.
A recent U.S. study found that boys aged 12 to 15 who have no underlying medical condition are four to six times more likely to have a rare but serious heart attack than their vaccine. Monthly.
However, several health experts argued that not vaccinating children against Covid-1 could lead to serious illness and harm already disadvantaged children. Highly vaccinated population and low efficacy of the vaccine against delta variant infections.
JCVI said in a statement this month, “Initially the margin of benefits is considered very low based on health perspectives, otherwise the suggestion of a universal program to vaccinate healthy 12 to 15 year old children cannot be supported.”
The committee recommended that children between the ages of 12 and 15 should jump only if they are medically weak or with someone.
Scientists argue that vaccinating young people on a moral question
Although only 2 percent of children are infected with Covid-1 by, Margie Danchin, an immunization researcher at the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, emphasized that children need immunizations to protect obsolete adults.
“Children can still be infected with the virus, and especially transmit it to adults. Unconventional adults, irresistible grandparents are vulnerable,” he told ABC TV.
“So they (children) also play a role in the infection. Of course, we want them to go back to school. We want to see them get their lives back. ”
However, a group of researchers from Canada, the United States and France argued in a study by BMJ, a UK peer-reviewed medical trade journal, that it was “speculative” that adults would be safer if vaccinated against young people.
They said that even if someone took protection against severe Covid-1, a high number of children would need to be vaccinated to protect an adult from the deadly Covid-1 infection, given the low infection rate and high proportion. Children are already infected, and most adults have been vaccinated or have already been infected.
“If the goal is to protect adults, shouldn’t the focus be on ensuring that adults are fully vaccinated instead of targeting children?” This raises an “important question” of morality, scientists asked.
“Vaccination of very low-risk children is highly discriminatory in rich countries, while many vulnerable adults in low-income countries have no dose.”
“In addition, the long-term effects of gene-based vaccines, which are associated with new vaccine platforms, remain largely unknown,” the researchers added.
A study published in The Lancet Europe in March found that school teachers were more likely to receive SARS-CoV-2 From other adults They are from their students.
Professor Adam Finn, a member of the JCVI, told the Times last Saturday that, in general, scientists would fully investigate the long-term consequences of rare vaccine side effects before recommending them to children, but the COVID-19 public health crisis prevented them from doing so.
This (vaccinating children) is a subtle balanced decision. It is not a black-and-white decision. It is not necessary for these children to be vaccinated, but equally, it is a completely intelligent thing to do, ”he said.
This News Originally From – The Epoch Times