In the afternoon of this Friday, October 20, 2023, a subject identified as Rodolfo ‘N’, former father-in-law of Blanca Paulina ‘N’, was arrested. a female victim of femicide last May.
Blanca Paulina came to criticize her ex-father-in-law in the month of March, she assured that the subject He always harassed her On that occasion she said he threatened her and sexually assaulted her.
Two months later, in May, Blanca Paulina was attacked by bullets and in a few minutes he died.
On May 23, a woman named Blanca Paulina ‘N’ was the victim of femicide in the streets of Cosmopolitan neighborhood of the mayor’s office in Azcapotzalco.
A security camera on Ceylán Avenue shows the moment when A subject approached and shot the woman who was with his little 5-year-old daughter, who was also hit by a bullet.
Despite the five bullets that she received, Blanca Paulina did not die immediately, she arrived at the hospital where she said that the subject who shot her told her that…
“Mr. sent you. Rodolfo in his feelings.”
Blanca Paulina, 41, was harassed by her father-in-law; the neighbors claimed that even the man named Rodolfo ‘N’ locked up his son (Blanca’s husband) because he was in the way.
The victim has criticized his father-in-law for sexual, physical, emotional abuse and harassment. The neighbors knew that he was always harassing her.
Just in March, Blanca reports again on the subject Rodolfo ‘N’on that occasion because he said he threatened to kill her.
For more than an hour the alleged hitmen waited for Blanca Paulina, it was learned that the subject who fired the weapon was not alone, two companions were waiting for him in a taxi parked on Mayorca street, a woman and a man
The mother of four was a quiet, hardworking person who was dedicated to her family and didn’t bother anyone, neighbors said.
Her little daughter who witnessed the attack screamed violently and said that her mother had been punched in the holes. Medical personnel also treated the girl since she was shot in her leg.
The data from reporter Carlos Jiménez shows that the subject is wanted by the Special Prosecutor’s Office for Sexual Crimes, but only for harassment. And that a judge is also investigating the case regarding the actions of the staff of the specialized prosecutor’s office.