Monday, December 05, 2022

California and Vermont Vote to Protect Abortion

ARCHIVO - Una camioneta pasa junto a carteles de campaña en contra y a favor de una propuesta de enmienda constitucional que garantizaría el acceso a derechos reproductivos como el aborto, junto a una carretera en Middlesex, Vermont, el 3 de noviembre de 2022. (AP Foto/Wilson Ring, Archivo)

FILE - A pickup truck drives past campaign signs in favor and against a proposed constitutional amendment that would guarantee access to reproductive rights such as abortion on November 3, 2022, along a highway in Middlesex, Vermont.  (AP Photo/Wilson Ring, FILE)

FILE – A pickup truck drives past campaign signs in favor and against a proposed constitutional amendment that would guarantee access to reproductive rights such as abortion on November 3, 2022, along a highway in Middlesex, Vermont. ( Associated Press Photo/Wilson Ring, FILE)

Associated Press

Voters in disputed Michigan on Tuesday enshrined abortion rights in the state’s constitution, as they did in California and Vermont, two traditionally Democratic states. There was still no clear winner in the referendum in Kentucky, a Republican stronghold on an anti-abortion proposal.

Supreme Court by Roe v. The votes were held months after the Wade precedent and the abolition of the constitutional right to abortion, which had hitherto been guaranteed to women across the country. June’s decision has prompted nearly total vetoes in about a dozen states.

In Michigan, advocates for a referendum to protect abortion rights gathered more signatures than any other ballot initiative in the state’s history. The rule certainly eliminates the ban on abortion introduced in 1931, which was blocked by a judge but could be reactivated by another court. The initiative also recognizes the right to make decisions without interference in relation to pregnancy, abortion and other reproductive services such as contraception.

On the campus of Michigan State University, third-year student Devin Roberts said students seemed “angry” and saw voters queue up from the university’s polling places throughout the day. He said the issue of abortion was one of the main motivating factors.

“There’s a lot of energy on campus right now about Proposition 3, whether you agree with abortion or not,” Roberts said. “I think students want the same rights that their parents had when they were younger.”

Some two-thirds of American voters said abortion should be legal in most or all cases, according to Associated Press VoteCast, a comprehensive poll of more than 90,000 voters nationwide. Just one in 10 said abortion should be illegal in all cases.

Nearly 6 in 10 also said they were angry or unhappy with the Supreme Court’s decision, with fewer people saying they were happy or satisfied.

James Miller, 66, of Flint, Michigan, said he had his daughters, granddaughters and great-grandchildren on his mind when he voted for the measure.

“I think we should do the right thing for women,” she said. “It’s your body, it’s your privacy.”

Michelle Grosser of Swartz Creek, Michigan, said she opposes abortion, although she thinks there may be exceptions to any ban. “In a perfect world, I personally want all life to be preserved,” he said.

Critics argued that Michigan’s measures could supersede other state laws, such as requiring parents to be notified when a person under 18 has an abortion. Legal experts noted that other laws would change only if someone sues and wins, a process that can take years and is no guarantee of success.

Still, the message convinced some voters in Michigan, such as 64-year-old Brian Bauer of Mundy Township, who said the proposal was confusing and voted against it.

Bauer was against abortion, although he acknowledged some exceptions, stating that “no one is willing to include concessions, it is a yes or no vote”.

In Montana, for its part, it has been proposed to impose resuscitation efforts on newborns under threat of criminal sanctions, even in the unusual event of birth after attempted abortion.

In conservative Kentucky, the proposal would amend the state constitution to say there is no abortion right. The Republican-majority legislature has already passed an almost complete veto. The motion won’t change that rule, but it could result in a legal battle in this regard, with the next court date a week after the election.

Lawmakers added a proposed amendment to the ballot last year, something some thought could bring more conservative voters to the polls. But since Roe’s decision, abortion rights advocates have raised nearly $1.5 million to fight the proposal. They hoped to repeat this summer’s unexpected result in conservative Kansas, where voters overwhelmingly rejected a similar amendment that would have allowed new vetoes or sanctions.

Preliminary results indicated that thousands of Kentucky voters who supported the re-election of Republican Senator Rand Paul opposed the amendment.

Voter Jim Stewart, 71, of Kentucky, said he voted for Paul, whom he called “the only person on television who makes any sense.”

Stewart, registered as a Republican, said she opposed abortion but voted against the amendment. “You have to leave some choice here.”

Al Smith, 83, voted in favor. “I don’t believe in abortion at all under any circumstances,” he said. The two spoke at an elementary school in Simpsonville, a small town outside Louisville.

The issue of abortion was raised in Vermont when the state legislature passed a law in 2019 that guaranteed reproductive rights such as getting pregnant and access to birth control. Advocates for the Reproductive Freedom Voting Committee said that Rue’s repeal means “state-level security is critical to protecting access to reproductive health care.”

California has already taken several measures aimed at making abortion easier and has set aside millions of taxpayer dollars to help pay for abortion travel. Voters decided whether to approve language in the state constitution explicitly guaranteeing abortion and access to contraception.

Voters in Montana were being asked whether criminal charges should be made for medical personnel unless they were “medically just and reasonable” to save the life of the child after childbirth, including the rare possibility of miscarriage after an attempted abortion. “Don’t do everything.


Associated Press writers Tammy Weber in Flint, Michigan and Rebecca Reynolds in Simpsonville, Kentucky contributed to this report.

This story is basically . was published on November 9, 2022 1:46 am.

World Nation News is a digital news portal website. Which provides important and latest breaking news updates to our audience in an effective and efficient ways, like world’s top stories, entertainment, sports, technology and much more news.

Latest News

Related Stories

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Thanks for submitting your comment!