The Federal Court of Buenos Aires decided that the federal court presided over by Judge María Eugenia Capuchetti will continue the process of the warrant sent to the United States to search for information contained in the social networks of the three detained because of the trial. assassination of Vice President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner.
Thus the Court of Appeals settled the conflict that started between the court and the Federal Oral Court 6 preparing the upcoming trial of the three accused Fernando Sabag Montiel, Brenda Uliarte and Gabriel Carrizo.
Capuchetti’s position is that TOF 6 should follow the process and respond to a request for clarification made from the United States. But days later the judges of TOF 6 indicated that it should be Capuchetti who continues to urge.
“It is not appropriate for this Federal Criminal Oral Court 6 to respond or issue a decision regarding the request for explanations or clarifications made by the Department of Justice of the United States, through the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, because it is a test. whose production is waiting for the stage of instruction,” said TOF 6 at the time.
This Wednesday, finally, the chambermaids Pablo Bertuzzi and Mariano Llorens allowed an appeal by the prosecutor of the case, Carlos Rivolo, and ordered that Capuchetti be the one to continue the procedure, initiated by the judge during the investigation for attempted murder on September 1, 2022.
“It is noted that the evidentiary measure in question was precisely ordered while the proceedings were being processed in the investigation phase, before the trial was raised,” explained the Court of Appeals.
In addition, he continued, “it seems appropriate that, due to the urgency of the case, it is the investigating headquarters that continues to send the requested information through diplomatic channels, without prejudice to what is ultimately decided in the last case that the content of the information contained in those social media accounts”.
The judges warned that “in addition to the urgency to be seen is the seriousness of the institution of the fact investigated here, which, as we have mentioned on various occasions, must create methods of evidence that will be relevant and useful for to examine the truth. , without effort.” no hurry”.
