Wednesday, December 07, 2022

Catalan Psycho-Republic and the Way of the Quebec Referendum

When last week I heard Aragonés justify a “Same Clarity Law in Canada” So that Catalonia could get its “long-awaited” and “legitimate” independence, I remembered an article in which I published abc back in 2001, titled adjudicationAnd he was talking PNV’s frenzy to take out To walk the mummy of self-determination. I compared that nationalist material to a sick obsession with Norman Bates In psychosisDue to which he used to go to the attic repeatedly to take out the mother and mother in the procession. First conclusion, then and now, there is no business that a mummy can tolerate in the attic; And even less if you have a son who follows him.

But Aragones’ speech – at that plenary session in which, funnily enough, some functionaries carrying the mummy of the Catalan Psycho-Republic have rebelled against him – finds himself reaffirming his commitment to get the mummy out. not limited to. Closet. His first coup attempt failed and once Pedro Sanchez Castajon -The traitor who presides over the government of Spain- Having released the thieves and rioters who jailed it, Aragonese defends the “legal framework” with which it intends to break the unity of the Spanish nation.

This is not the first time that Catalan nationalists – such as the once Basques – have appealed to the Quebec model to claim independence for Euscadi or Catalonia. Nor are it the only nationalists who have “argued” in favor of a unique model for a region plagued by separatist impulses. was in 2017 francisco de carrerasso Ciudadanos—who, together with other renowned professors—signed a proposal to reform the EC, proposing a new additional provision to recognize the “uniqueness” of Catalonia, a concept widely used by libertarians and/or Used as a magic recipe by the self-conscious. To counter the Catalan crisis: “… a reform process of the territorial model can address three issues with respect to Catalonia: recognition of its singularity, the recovery of inactive statutory material by the rule of law and the referral to the statute. identity aspects or institutional or regional organizations that affect only that region and not the rest…”.

Far from eliminating the additional provisions established by the 1978 constitution for Navarra and the Basque Country, the proposal to reform the constitution added a new holder of privileges, Catalonia. But the biggest trap is that it proposed that this singularity be established through an additional provision, taking away our right to make our own decisions by voting on that constitutional change in a referendum. And that adding additional provisions to the Constitution does not require a referendum, an absolute majority serves in the Congress of Deputies.

if these Constitutional experts chose that path It was precisely because they knew that we Spaniards would not agree that a new constitution would serve to deepen inequality among citizens, while having a parliamentary majority willing to pay the toll to free people. Those who hold similar positions from different ideological or political fronts deliberately ignore that other regions of Spain, Catalonia’s only singularity with respect to language, already recognized in the constitutional text. And if they hide it, it’s because the singularity they intend to recognize in Catalonia to “remove the situation” is nothing more than a privilege and a way to reward both those politicians. Those who have done a coup against democracy and those who have given them. Forgiveness

Camino Quebec Socialists have also defended this. Iketa did this in 2016, when he was the PSC’s first secretary, and in 2018 it was Pedro Sánchez who, on a visit to Canada, praised him saying that “with politics you can find a solution to a separatist crisis .. . “. those who defend Quebec Road -Whether it is Aragonese, Pedro Sánchez, Carreras, or any columnist in the public or concrete press who writes or speaks in the service of those who pay them… – they are attuned to the essence of the matter by equating fundamentally different political realities. lie about. Quebec Model Not applicable in Spain, Stephen Dion, the father of the Clarity Law, explained it in Bilbao in 2003. “We needed a clarity law because we don’t have Article 2 like yours in our Constitution.” Article 2: “The Constitution is based on the indissoluble unity of the Spanish nation, the common and indivisible homeland of all Spaniards, and recognizes and guarantees the right to autonomy of the nationalities and territories in which it comprises and the solidarity among all of them”.

Since they appeal to clarity, we’re going to clarify everything. Quebec or Scotland (another common reference to Spanish nationalists/separatists) does not serve as a model for Spain or for any of the regions involved. Dion herself explained it to the journalist who questioned her on the pages of it in 2017 Country: “Scotland and Quebec are the two exceptions”. Article 2 of its constitution, which stipulates the indissoluble unity of the Spanish nation, is nothing extraordinary; The cases of Canada and the United Kingdom are exceptional”. And he insisted: “Being a citizen is a transferable right to your children. This is the democratic interpretation of Article 2 of the Spanish Constitution. And that is why so many countries are democratic and indivisible, including the new democracies, After years under the communist empire, the first thing he included in his constitution was that his country was indivisible.

Of course, if those defending Canada’s similar law to Spain would bother to read its contents. law of clarity I’m sure the excitement was gone. Because, in essence, what the law sets out: it will be the House of Commons (our Deputy of Congress) who will approve the text of the question and decide whether it is clear and can be drawn up in a referendum; that the Government of Canada will refrain from negotiating the terms under which a province may secede from Canada because ambiguous questions do not lead to negotiations; and that Canada’s provinces do not have the power to secede from Canada, so the secession of any province would require an amendment to the Canadian Constitution, requiring, at least, the governments of all provinces as well as those of Canada. Negotiations involving the government would be needed.

In other words, those who demand the Law of Clarity for Catalonia are proposing to repeal Article 2 of our Constitution, because if it did not exist, it would be a referendum to be broken by all Spaniards. Voting should not be done. Once again, they are trying to deceive us by calling things by names they are not and saying frankly that is nothing more than to abandon the unity of the Spanish nation.
And to conclude this article, allow me a wake-up call. It is highly worrying that Sanchez’s response to Aragonese’s latest diatribe is to confirm that he is ready to “re-read” the statute that TC declared unconstitutional. They will see how the Socialists dust off Carreras’ proposal to de facto repeal Article 2 of the Election Commission, using an anti-systemic majority and collusion with a TC, whom they are completely parasitizing. Huh. those days

World Nation News is a digital news portal website. Which provides important and latest breaking news updates to our audience in an effective and efficient ways, like world’s top stories, entertainment, sports, technology and much more news.

Latest News

Related Stories

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Thanks for submitting your comment!