Sunday, March 3, 2024

Deadline for the PSOE and the separatists to approve the amnesty

The meeting of the Congressional Board on Tuesday should agree on the deadline given by the Justice Commission to grant the amnesty law for the second time after failing a week ago in the Plenary. In general, according to the report prepared by the lawyers of the Congress to which LA RAZÓN has access, there is time until February 21, because there are 15 days, counting from February 6.

In this sense, the lawyers apply the deadlines of the emergency procedure already approved by the Board (that is, the processing time is reduced by half and so it gives 15 days instead of a month) and make a favorable interpretation of Article 131.2 of the Regulations of the Congress because there are legal doubts about whether the amnesty has been reversed after the rejection of the Plenary or if there is room for a second chance. If approved by the Commission, it will go straight to the Senate.

In any case, the doubts about the parliamentary procedure will continue to exist, and at the meeting of the Board this Tuesday, the writings presented by the PP and Vox against the law will be discussed because they consider that it refuses. Because? Because it was reversed by the Plenary of Congress last week in the general vote, the opposition considers that the norm is decreasing and there is no room for the “second chance” of the Justice Commission. In other words, it is understood that the law has been rejected.

In this sense, they cited two introductions for two organic laws to change the Organic Law of the Judiciary between 1996 and 2000 that also did not progress in the Plenary because they did not reach the 176 votes required in an absolute majority, but they got it. a simple majority (more votes in favor than against): thanks to that, they got a second chance at the Justice Commission. On the other hand, the amnesty did not reach an absolute majority or a simple majority, and, therefore, it was understood that the bill was refused and did not benefit from the “second chance” of the Justice Commission.

However, in the lawyers’ report, which was prepared by the presidential advisers of the Congress, the arguments of the PP and Vox were rejected. Because? Because they consider that in the plenary session there are two different votes: the first on the opinion, which received an absolute majority, and the second on the text as a whole, which got more “noes” rather than “yes.” Each organic law always has two final votes in the plenary (opinion and general).

In this sense, lawyers consider that there are “two different votes, for their purpose and for their purpose and result.” “As such different votes were expressed by the Presidency and known to the members of the House during the voting,” said the report of the lawyers, who think that if the requests of the PP and Vox are taken care of, it could mean leaving “no effect” on the first vote, where there are more “yes” than “no” and the result of the second will be “de facto of both.” “This de facto annulment of a vote falls short of regulatory provisions and means disregarding the will of the Plenary,” he added.

World Nation News Desk
World Nation News Desk
World Nation News is a digital news portal website. Which provides important and latest breaking news updates to our audience in an effective and efficient ways, like world’s top stories, entertainment, sports, technology and much more news.
Latest news
Related news