- Advertisement -spot_img
Saturday, October 16, 2021

Democrats push to codify the Unlimited Abortion Act

Democrats made their urgent need to legislate by giving women unlimited access to abortion in their second hearing House Oversight and Reform Committee on Thursday this week. Hearings are being held in response to the recently passed abortion law in Texas to limit abortion in the first few weeks of abortion.

Chairman Caroline Maloney (DN.Y.) said the Senate must pass the Women’s Health Protection Act because of all “extremist” state abortion laws and the “unfavorable” Supreme Court, citing the conservative majority.

Maloney said women need to have control over their own bodies and the state government is endangering women’s rights because “they are bulldozing through them. We must take bold steps to protect and expand the right and access to abortion care.”

“Last week, House of Representatives Congress passed Judy Chu’s Women’s Health Protection Act, which would establish a federally protected right to abortion care for every person in the United States, no matter where they are.”

Democrats also have a bill that would overturn the Hyde Amendment and allow taxpayers to use dollars to use abortion funds for those who can’t afford them.

Representative Virginia Foxx (RW.Va.) said she does not want to make abortion normal.

“I refuse to normalize abortion and reject its premise that the sacrifice of an innocent life that cannot speak for itself is in any way justified. We live in a society that errs in its choice for freedom and denies the dignity of the future,” Time Fox said.

With the Supreme Court currently having a conservative majority, Democrats fear the court could overturn the crucial abortion decision Rowe v. Wade. They are trying to prevent states from enacting abortion restrictions, such as a bill recently passed by the Texas Legislature, which limits almost all abortions after six weeks and allows whistleblowers to anyone who violates this law.

Self-help activists hold signs in response to anti-abortion activists participating in the “March for Life” of anti-abortion activists marking the anniversary of the March 1 Supreme Court case, which legalizes abortion in the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on January 18, 2019. (Soul Layeb / AFP / Getty Images)

The Supreme Court will consider a Mississippi state case on Dec. 1, asking the court to overturn a 1973 ruling that allowed abortions for up to 23 weeks, such as Rowe. Wade’s decision.

Mississippi lawyers said in a paper filed in court in July that Rowe v. Wade’s verdict was wrong and should be overturned. Acting Solicitor General Brian H.

Meanwhile, on Sept. 24, the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives voted 218-211 to pass the Comprehensive Abortion Access Bill, the Women’s Health Protection Act. Henry Queller (D-Texas), a Democrat, opposed the abortion bill.

Read Also:  The Pentagon is preparing to shut down a possible government: spokesman

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), a moderate who supports a woman’s right to choose, said she opposes the recent abortion law because it undermines the exceptions given by healthcare providers who refuse to perform abortions on moral or religious grounds.

Democrat Judy Chu (de-Calif.), Who initiated the abortion bill, said her bill is fighting laws like Texas.

“But anti-abortion extremists have been working since the Rowe v. Wade pass to provide abortion services out of the reach of Americans as long as possible. The latest example is the SB8 in Texas. Texas law is deadly and perfectly cool. It takes caution to harass someone to help them have an abortion, ”Chu said.

Under the new Abortion Bill, under the “Women’s Health Protection Act, 2021”, a woman can receive abortion services without any restrictions or requirements: Information “, there is no limit to the provider’s ability to dispense or dispense medication, no need to disclose to a provider or other entity the need for medically unnecessary visits and the need for abortion services before the fetus can function.

Opponents of the broader abortion bill object to the lack of consideration for the rights of the child. Chu’s bill states that a woman can have an abortion at any time “before the fetus is functional, which includes restrictions on a particular abortion procedure” and that the abortion is allowed. Will pose a risk to the patient’s life or health.

Pictures of the ages
Pro-Choice protesters are preparing to sue the US Supreme Court in Washington on November 0, 2005 for an abortion case.

At Thursday’s hearing, one of the two pro-life witnesses, Texas-based OB / GYN, told the In Ingrid Scope Committee that science has progressed from Rowe v. Wade and that lawmakers should consider new research when passing abortion laws. Consider the life of the child.

“We have created a class of people who are considered unworthy of life on the basis of their own merits, valuable only when someone else wants them to. That is the definition of genocide. We need to re-examine it as a scientific and human rights issue, not through political bias or social engineering, ”he said. Scope said.

The Democrats ’abortion bill will now go to the Senate, and Maloney has called for the expansion of abortion opportunities in the upper house. “I call on the Senate to meet at this moment and pass this critical bill immediately,” Maloney said.

Masuma Haque

Follow

.

This News Originally From – The Epoch Times

World Nation News Deskhttps://www.worldnationnews.com
World Nation News is a digital news portal website. Which provides important and latest breaking news updates to our audience in an effective and efficient ways, like world’s top stories, entertainment, sports, technology and much more news.
Latest news
Related news
- Advertisement -

Leave a Reply