Russia’s policy parties are divided over whether it should try to meet the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) economic ambitions in Afghanistan or re-recommend only to work in the Central Asian security bloc.
Maxim Suchkov, a senior fellow at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations’s Laboratory for International Trends Analysis, said there was disagreement over whether the risk of a state building in the Middle East was worth the লাভ 1 trillion Afghanistan’s potential gain. The price of rare earth metals.
“There is a debate in Russian policy-making about the ambitions that Russia should pursue in Afghanistan at the moment,” Suchakov said, adding that one group suggested that Russia should seek exploitation, not just security. Some opportunities to explore rare earth metals and other economic development projects.
He added: “The other party warns against this deep involvement and says our strategy should be security-based only. So Russia should not think about state buildings or development or infrastructure in Afghanistan because it is a black hole that will drain all resources.
Suchkov’s comments came during an online panel hosted by Tufts University’s Fletcher School, which examined the response of Taliban-led Afghanistan to the future of Russia, China and Central Asia.
After the resurgence of the Taliban, there was some speculation that Russia and China would quickly seize the opportunity to develop Afghanistan’s vast mineral resources, but Suchakov’s remarks indicated that at least for Russia there was a clear disadvantage to such a proposal.
Suchkov pointed out that this difference could be ignored in the American context because Russia and China had a tendency to act together against the United States, when in reality they could do the same. He cited the Russian and Chinese attacks on the US failure in Afghanistan as examples.
Suchakov said that as far as Afghanistan is concerned, the United States has done more than Russia and China to undermine its position. “So Russia and China are collecting less hanging fruit of glotting and humiliation here alike and making the most of the US move in Afghanistan.”
“It simply came to our notice then that they were trying to do something together in Afghanistan. But perhaps the only new thing that brings Moscow and Beijing together right now is deep concern about what might happen next. [in Afghanistan]. ”
Niva Yauzan, a colleague in the Eurasia program at the Foreign Policy Research Institute in Philadelphia, agreed that Russia and China have maintained a strong sense of each other’s goals in Central Asia, but there was pressure on China to try the CCP. Matching Russia’s security presence.
“Chinese scholars have said that if China does not get involved militarily or does little in the way of security, Central Asian states will eventually realize that Russia is the only security provider that can do anything to ensure that everything is going well.” Yao said.
“China is very insecure about this,” Yao added.
Yao noted that Chinese commanders in the region were often attacked by translators because Russian was the regular language of security. Although China may be as economically viable, Russia’s military was a party to defeat in military matters, Yao said.
According to Nargis Casinova, a senior fellow at the Central Asia program at Harvard University’s Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies, who spoke at the panel, Russia’s security dominance in Central Asia could erode.
“There is some competition in security in Central Asia. The situation is changing, “Casenova said. “Before, Russia had this kind of exclusive right, but now it’s getting thinner.”
As evidence of this changing tide, Casenova noted that the CCP recently set up a military base on the border between Tajikistan and Afghanistan. Meanwhile, with Chinese relations, African forces have begun to learn Mandarin and thus language barriers can lead to more military cooperation.
After all, the three experts agree that Russia and China have different ambitions in Afghanistan, but any reports of a breakdown in their relationship have been exaggerated. They said the two countries could build their relationship but like many Sino-Russian efforts, the shape that the process would take could probably be one between the two countries, rather than pursuing their own goals. Tandem
This News Originally From – The Epoch Times