The former leader of the opposition will not be able to stand in the next general election
The British Labor leader, Keir Starmer, this Thursday moved more screws in his plan to remove the presence and even the shadow of his predecessor, the leftist Jeremy Corbyn, from his program and political perspective. The National Executive Committee of the party, NEC, finally approved the election of a veteran parliamentarian as Labor’s candidate in the next general election, at the end of the year 2024. Starmer himself introduced the proposal to the members. ‘ The Executive Congress, which approved him by 22 votes in favor and twelve against.
Jon Lansman, the founder of the grassroots group Momentum, which supported Mr Corbyn, accused Starmer of acting in an authoritarian manner “like Labour’s Putin”. The fact that the centrist leader, who controls the profile and aspirations of the main opposition party, using the submergence of conservatives in the voting intention of the voters, is angry with the party of socialists and radical militants who defend the “democratic right”. to choose their local diocese.
Corbyn has represented Islington North-West London since 1983, won ten consecutive parliamentary elections and won a majority of over 28,000 votes in 2019, when the Tories almost swept the country on the promise of then Prime Minister Boris. Johnson, to Ex Brexit. “Starmer has broken his duty to protect the rights of the Labor Party and has disrespected the foundations of our democratic party,” announced the deputy, who had already been expelled from the parliamentary group in 2020.
There is no return in the opinion of the NEC. The statutes do not contemplate the option of appealing against this type of movement, which the centrist leader has been preparing for months. In February, Starmer publicly declared that his former political boss would not be renewing his seat under the Labor banner. Since his election almost three years ago, the London MP has also cleaned up the scourge of anti-Semitism, which Corbyn allowed to spread under his leadership and whose harmful significance he continues to ignore. The transformation of the parties, as the former lawyer emphasizes, is “permanent, fundamental and irrevocable.”
Corbyn still has support. “We’re not going anywhere,” he threatened this week. He has an option to defend his seat as an independent, as it would cost him his expulsion from the party and put a member of the Labor volunteers who supported his campaign at risk. Victoria’s long association with the region is likely to be due to her dedication to local issues and her electorate’s familiarity with the septuagenarian activists.
Meanwhile, Rishi Sunak’s Afghan government will promote a refugee settlement program with measures that threaten their future in the United Kingdom, according to complaints from the parliamentary opposition and NGOs. Some 8,000 families and individuals who managed to leave the country after the Taliban takeover in 2021 are still living in hotels or commercial residences, at an estimated cost of about 1.5 million dollars per day.
Sunak has set out to reduce this cost, in addition to the more than five million euros that arrive on a hotel bill for refugees arriving in England by boat across the English Channel. The Illegal Immigration Bill, which has been debated in the Westminster Parliament, aims at this last group of foreigners, who will be held at a port, deported to a “safe country” and will never be able to claim asylum in the United Kingdom. if the law is approved in the present text. Not even children are reserved restrictively, as Sunak confirmed before the Commons committee. “The goal is not to detain minors, but it’s important that we don’t inadvertently make a decision that encourages people to come with their children,” he said.
Afghans received through official channels now have three months to vacate the hotel rooms where they are staying. The government will allocate some 40,000 euros for the purpose of the allocation of camps and the assimilation of refugee groups. But, as he announces in Commons, if the offer of housing is rejected, “there will be no other”, and the individual or family in question will lose the shelter they are currently protecting.
According to the criteria of
The trust ProjectLearn more
