Film Argentina, 1985of Santiago Mater, Acclaimed and warmly received at the last Venice Film Festival. But its big impact reached social networks even before the official premiere, where the excitement of the film’s launch nears adds to some controversy. For example, as he acted on Twitter Malena Piccho You marcelo mazzarelloWhich transcended the central theme that originally touched on the film’s story: Decisions for meetings.
Argentina, 1985 It stars Ricardo Darin and Peter Lanzani. It is a recreation of the imagination of the military junta’s trial, which took place in the country at the exact same time. 1985, It was a judicial process in which, with extremely painful evidence and evidence, the leaders of the last military dictatorships were sentenced for crimes committed during their de facto governments and human rights violations that took place between them. 1976 y 1983.
This trial, which took place during the government of the radical President raul alphonsinBarely a year and months after the return of democracy, the military ended up in prison with junta members and was an example of justice to the whole world. its two great architects were prosecutors Julio Cesar Strassera and Luis Moreno Ocampo, He is the one who stars in Mitre’s film. while the first is played by the prosecutor Darinexpresses another lanjaniIn a historical reconstruction that promises to be memorable.
The central theme of the film, to be released in Argentine cinemas on 29 September, is So decisions to boards, But, despite the fact that this milestone in national history is considered an epic, how could it have been otherwise, it generated its own controversy on social networks, with a counterpoint between the comedian and the screenwriter. Malena Piccho and actors marcelo mazzarello,
Beginning of the crossing. from a tweet pichot in which he welcomed the film Darin and Lanjani. “It is a pleasure that it has been released at this time. Argentina, 1985, I haven’t seen the movie yet, but it’s always good to remember how valuable it is to have a country that has sued the board,” the comedian wrote.
But the message soon received an unexpected reply. it was one of mazzarello, a habitual critic of the ruling party, who disagreed with the comedian’s concept that it was “one country” that judged the boards. The actor wrote in response to Pichot: “It was not a country. it was alfonsin, as well as the 53 percent who voted for him and a handful of judges by the ball. Peronism offered a pardon, opposed the trial and did not participate in the report of Konadep,
currency of mazzarelloWhich was what several other tweeters uncovered in response to the comic’s message, collecting historical data showing that representatives of Peronism were not actively involved in the promotion or development at the time. decisions to boards, presidential candidate for jurisprudence, an opponent of alphonsinArgentine Italian luderhad indicated that, if he became president, he would respect him The “self-forgiveness” that the military had planned for itself.
And there were also no legislators or representatives of Peronism, despite being called, in the formation of the National Commission on the Disappearance of Persons (CoNaDep), a group of notable personalities headed by Ernest Sabato, who devoted himself to investigating and collecting data on human rights violations committed during the dictatorship. Investigation was essential to the development of the test and everything was recorded in the remarkable documentary book and never,
As is usually the case in social networks, users’ opinions were divided between those who supported Picot’s message and those who went more for feedback. mazzarello, However, like the actor, most of the innumerable comments that were highlighted said that the judicial process has nothing to do with it. “A Country”But with a political decision of Ral Alfonsín’s government.
Peronism did not participate in Konadep, The boards were tested in a democracy in a radical government. Study”, for example, wrote user Marilyn Marti; “It was so cool, it’s a shame Peronism pardoned them,” another posted in memory of Carlos Menem’s 1990 clemency for the military; A third user wrote, ‘Where it says ‘one country’ will be replaced by a radical government.
hours later, pichot Reply to the actor’s reply not once, but twice. First, in the same column of responses to his own tweet, Standpera wrote: “Hello marcelo, do you say I can’t be proud to be Argentine and the board has decided because I vote for Kirchnerism? Or where do you want to go?
A little later, the screenwriter retweeted the response. mazzarello And in tandem with that he expressed his desire not to continue the tweet exchange: “The saddest thing about this response is the hate in your gorilla nerves (sic) as you would have responded to a tweet with peronism.” which did not mention or allude to Peronism at any time. If you refrain from chatting with me from now on, I would appreciate it.”