- Advertisement -spot_img
Monday, January 24, 2022

On January 6, the Panel of Experts will propose to accuse the former Trump official of disrespect

WASHINGTON – A House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol ruled on Monday to open contempt for a congressional hearing against Jeffrey Clark, a former Justice Department official implicated in President Donald Trump’s efforts to cancel the 2020 presidential election, scheduling a vote this week on recommendations of the criminal prosecution for his refusal to cooperate with the commission’s summons.

The vote will mark the second such showdown between the committee and a Trump ally since Congress began investigating the Capitol riots, including the former president’s attempts to disrupt the election. In October, the House of Representatives voted to recommend another of Trump’s associates, Stephen K. Bannon, to be charged with criminal contempt of Congress for obstructing an investigation. He was subsequently indicted by a federal grand jury on two counts, which could have held up to two years behind bars in total.

In early November, Mr. Clark appeared before the committee but delivered a letter from his lawyer, Harry W. McDougald, stating that Mr. Clark would not answer substantive questions. The letter cites the attorney-client privilege protecting his conversations with Mr Trump and argues that Mr Clarke “was under an obligation not to testify to your committee regarding information protected by the former president’s statement of executive privilege.”

Mr. McDougald also argued in the letter that Mr. Clarke had nothing to do with the January 6 events.

“He informed me that he worked from home that day to avoid fighting potential street closings to get to and from his office at the General Court,” the letter said, citing department headquarters next to the National Mall. “Mr. Clarke had no responsibility for overseeing security at the Capitol and was not able to deploy Department of Justice personnel or resources there.”

The committee issued a subpoena and notes from Mr. Clark. Under federal law, anyone summoned as a witness to Congress who refuses to comply can be charged with an offense that carries a fine of $ 100 to $ 100,000 and jail sentences ranging from one month to one year.

Refusing to cooperate, Mr. Bannon cited a directive that Mr. Trump sent out to his former aides and advisers to exercise immunity and refrain from handing over documents that might be protected by executive privilege. The former president also sued the committee in an attempt to block the publication of at least 770 pages of documents related to the Capitol riot, a case pending before a federal appeals court.

Mr. Bannon threatened to turn the case against him into a “hell of a misdemeanor” for the Justice Department, and in a Sunday hearing, federal prosecutors charged him and his lawyers with “out-of-court statements” that “clarify the defense’s position.” the real goal: to abuse the disclosure of the crime in order to consider this case in the media, and not in court. “

At the same time, the committee is considering what to do with a third potential witness, Mark Meadows, the former Trump chief of staff, who also refused to comply with the agenda. The committee said Mr. Meadows refused to answer even basic questions, such as whether he used a private mobile phone to communicate on January 6 and where his text messages have been since that day.

Mr. Clarke was a little-known Justice Department official who repeatedly pushed his colleagues to help Mr. Trump reverse his electoral defeat. The Senate Judiciary Committee said in a recent report that there is credible evidence that Mr. Clarke was involved in attempts to thwart a peaceful transfer of power, citing his proposal to deliver a letter to state legislators in Georgia urging them to postpone certifying the election results. results.

Read Also:  Online retailing is getting more expensive and discounts for the holidays are low: Adobe survey

In January, the New York Times reported that Mr. Clarke also discussed with Mr. Trump a plan to remove Jeffrey A. Rosen, the former Acting Attorney General, and use Justice Department powers to coerce state legislators in Georgia into overturning election results. Mr. Clark denied the report, based on the accounts of four former Trump administration officials who asked not to be named for fear of retaliation.

The Senate Judicial Committee also said that Mr Clark had recommended a press conference announcing that the Justice Department was investigating allegations of electoral fraud in line with Mr Trump’s repeated demands, despite the lack of evidence of any fraud. … This offer was rejected by senior department leaders.

In a private testimony before the Judicial Committee, Mr Rosen said that Mr Clarke told him Mr Trump was preparing to fire Mr Rosen and support Mr Clark’s strategy of pursuing voting machine hacking and fraud conspiracy theories.

“Well, I won’t get fired by those who work for me,” Mr. Rosen said after telling Mr. Clark.

World Nation News Deskhttps://www.worldnationnews.com
World Nation News is a digital news portal website. Which provides important and latest breaking news updates to our audience in an effective and efficient ways, like world’s top stories, entertainment, sports, technology and much more news.
Latest news
Related news
- Advertisement -


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here