- Advertisement -spot_img
Monday, December 6, 2021

San Jose finally reaches a settlement with the victims of the devastating 2017 Coyote Creek floods

Seeking relief from one of the city’s worst natural disasters, San Jose leaders quietly approved a $ 750,000 settlement for a group of approximately 240 tenants and property owners whose homes suffered significant damage from the devastating 2017 Coyote Creek flood.

The settlement came almost four years after residents sued the city, the Santa Clara Valley water area and Santa Clara County, claiming the organizations failed to properly warn them of impending flooding, were aware of obstacles such as debris and deposits that have blocked the flow of water. water through the stream channel and did little to prevent or mitigate its damage.

When Coyote Creek flooded in February 2017 following severe atmospheric river storms, it was the worst flooding San Jose has seen since 1997, forcing 14,000 people to evacuate and causing approximately $ 100 million in damage.

Later, Santa Clara County was excluded from the residents’ claim. Meanwhile, the case against the Santa Clara Valley Aquatic District is still active, with a trial date set for May 2, 2022, and residents involved in the case are expecting much higher payouts than what was mediated by the city.

“After nearly four years of litigation, we are satisfied that the San Jose case is resolved,” said Ann Kepner, lead attorney representing tenants and homeowners. “And now we are preparing our case for the water court.”

Avenue Nordale remains flooded in San Jose, California on Wednesday, February 22, 2017 (Anda Chu / Bay Area News Group)

The $ 750,000 settlement, unanimously approved by the City Council on Tuesday night without any discussion, will be split among five groups of plaintiffs, represented by different lawyers, based on their pro rata share of the total. However, the residents involved say that all this can go to the involvement of expert witnesses in their case against the water area.

Sandra Mall, a resident of the Nagli Park neighborhood in San Jose, was driven from her home for three weeks and suffered “hundreds of thousands of dollars” in damage after 6 feet of water flooded her home on the day of the flood.

San Jose finally reaches a settlement with the victims of the devastating 2017 Coyote Creek floods
Pictured here is Sandra Mall’s home after being hit by the 2017 Coyote Creek floods in San Jose, California. (Courtesy Rick Holden)

When asked about settling in the city, Moll replied that she was “glad to move forward and come to some conclusion from all this.”

“I hope that due to the conditions of this settlement, it will also stimulate the settlement of the water district,” she said. “But I doubt they’ll do it.”

Attempts to reach a joint settlement with the water area of ​​the Santa Clara Valley, also known as the Valley of Water, and residents have been unsuccessful. As a result, San Jose decided to move forward with its own agreement, although the city has denied all allegations of negligence and misconduct, according to San Jose City Attorney Nora Freemann.

During the 2017 winter rains, Anderson Reservoir – the largest reservoir in Santa Clara County – overflowed, and water rose over the shores of Coyote Creek. As water poured into the downtown areas surrounding the stream, including Rock Springs, Nagli Park and South Bay Mobile Homes, some people had to be rescued from their homes by boat.

San Jose officials, who faced harsh criticism for not evacuating residents earlier, admitted they did not do enough to properly notify residents who were potentially affected on the day of the flood that hit Tuesday after a long weekend of dedicated President’s Day.

San Jose finally reaches a settlement with the victims of the devastating 2017 Coyote Creek floods
San Jose Fire Department rescuers evacuate residents from the flooded Nordale neighborhood near Kelly Park in San Jose, California, Tuesday, February 21, 2017 (Dai Sugano / Bay Area News Group)

In a memo to the city council this week, Freemann said the city risks being liable for a much higher dollar amount if it doesn’t settle the case before trial.

Read Also:  Officers increase police presence at LA-area retail stores after The Grove robbed

“The $ 750,000 settlement is reasonable given the cost and risks of further litigation,” Freemann wrote in a memo. “Claimant damage to economic property is approximately $ 12.6 million based on written disclosure responses. … Even if the city is found guilty in a lawsuit, such a verdict could mean that the city is responsible for paying the entire amount of the claimed economic damage. “

Despite objections from Valley Water, which argued that the urban settlement was in bad faith and overstated the responsibility of the water district, Santa Clara County Chief Justice Sunil R. Kulkarni upheld the deal and essentially stated that if any liability was found , the water area will bear the brunt of this.

Kulkarni concluded that the main argument on behalf of the residents – the careless management of the Anderson Dam – was directed solely towards the water area. He also found that “it will be extremely difficult for the plaintiffs to establish accountability to the city” in the remaining two claims by residents who allege that the city’s storm sewer system is malfunctioning and that the city has failed to clear the stream of vegetation and debris that the city has only partial control.

World Nation News Deskhttps://www.worldnationnews.com
World Nation News is a digital news portal website. Which provides important and latest breaking news updates to our audience in an effective and efficient ways, like world’s top stories, entertainment, sports, technology and much more news.
Latest news
Related news
- Advertisement -

Leave a Reply