Monday, June 5, 2023

The day the news disappeared: The inside story on what happened when Facebook blanked Australia

The day news disappeared from Facebook a journalist emailed Rod Sims at 5:39am.

“First I have heard of this,” the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) chair wrote 20 minutes later, forwarding the information to Treasury deputy secretary Meghan Quinn and an unnamed person.

Facebook and search giant Google had long been aggrieved by legislation that would force them to pay news sites for content users found or linked to.

A year ago today Facebook took what Peter Lewis of the Center for Responsible Technology at the Australia Institute called the “nuclear option” – it blanked local news.

“Facebook has blocked news content from their platform,” an unnamed Treasury analyst in the Law Design Office emailed at 10:24am AEDT that morning, according to documents released through the Freedom of Information (FOI) process.

“A pop-up occurs saying Australian news content cannot be posted due to the government’s new law.

“Pages that have been blocked include traditional news websites such as ABC and The Australian (and) many government pages — including ACT Health, Hobart Women’s Domestic Violence Shelter and a lot of the COVID related information.”

Soon, public servants were working up lists of sites blocked by the internet giant, which had blanked a broad range of pages from Facebook’s estimated 17 million monthly users in Australia.

Globally, the US-based company claims 2.9 billion monthly active users on its site.

“Satire publications including the Beetota (sic) Advocate and the Chaser … some pretty niche publications which are borderline news ie Vogue, Top Gear, Scientific American, Australian Geographic and amusingly, Facebook’s own Facebook page [are also affected],” observed a Treasury analyst in the department’s Law Design Office.

Just after midday, an unnamed Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) official told Treasury what Treasurer Josh Frydenberg’s office had passed on to it about a discussion with Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg.

Mark Zuckerberg and Josh Frydenberg faced off over the government’s media bargaining code.,Reuters/ABC News,

“The conversation was ‘constructive’,” they noted.

“Mark Zuckerberg has raised a few remaining issues with the government’s news media bargaining code. But both the Morrison government and Facebook are committed to continuing the dialogue and try to find a path forward.”

Misinformation warning

Notes that follow detail an aggressive push-back by the Treasurer and Communications Minister Paul Fletcher against the arguments of the multi-billionaire Facebook co-founder. It is not clear from the documents if these arguments were raised directly in the conversation.

“The government is committed to enacting the news media bargaining code, which is now in the Senate after passing the House of Representatives last night,” a note of the meeting said.

“As we have said all along, we expect companies who are doing business in Australia to comply with the laws of the land.”

Communications minister paul fletcher wearing a suit looking at media at press conference in june 2021.
Paul Fletcher was caught between big media companies, Facebook and consumers when the social media giant prevented access to news through its platform.,ABC News: Adam Kennedy,

The email goes on to note Mr Fletcher’s previous arguments for the government’s model, and posits that removing news from Facebook would devalue its overall product because it might become a source of misinformation.

“As the Communications Minister has said, if Facebook were to operate in a mode where effectively all content from a news organization — with a fact checking process, with employed journalists and with editorial policies — is not available on Facebook then surely over time that would call into question the reliability of information on the platform.”

With the subject line “Facebook points” the email went to senior members of the Markets Conduct Division in Treasury, including assistant secretaries Robert Jeremenko and Tom Dickson. The latter passed it on to Ian Beckett in Washington DC, the capital of the United States.

Mr Beckett, minister-counseller (Treasury) at the Australian embassy there, sent back a detailed response at 2:46am. The content of the email was entirely redacted.

Pressure builds

Documents from inside the Communications Department suggest mounting public pressure from traditional media may have influenced a dramatic change in the federal government’s position on making Facebook and Google pay news organizations for sharing content.

What began as a voluntary code was rapidly switched into a mandatory one.

Documents from inside the department detailing the back-and-forth of negotiations and submissions suggest the change might have occurred as pressure from News Corp and other news organizations was raising the temperature.

The brief for the minister was prepared to summarize issues ahead of a meeting with Facebook to “discuss the Code with the Australian news media companies”. That meeting was meant to discuss Facebook’s participation in negotiations.

Under “Main Issues and Expected Outcomes”, the brief for Communications Minister Paul Fletcher stated:

“News media businesses have continued to campaign for immediate, mandatory codes of conduct. The intensity of these arguments has increased in recent weeks … additional pressure exerted on the news media sector by the COVID-19 pandemic has prompted further calls for action by the industry , particularly News Corp.”

The note is undated, but points to the March announcement of the planned closure of national news agency Australian Associated Press (AAP). The agency was later saved in June, after significant job losses.

On April 2, 2020 a blistering editorial in The Australian described an “existential crisis for the news business” and explicitly called out what it described as Communications Minister Paul Fletcher’s inaction.

“The government timidly asked parties to negotiate a voluntary code or it would institute a mandatory one by year’s end. Google and Facebook are neither in a hurry nor acting in good faith. Why would they?”

Politicians, the editorial said, had been “clueless bystanders to the implosion of media business models”.

“Our future is imperilled because Google and Facebook — ubiquitous, super-profitable, amoral, digital raiders — are inserting themselves between news outlets and customers. These two companies aren’t better at telling stories than we are; they don’t even try to compete on that score. What they’re expert at is gobbling up advertising revenue via algorithms that suck up our content.”

“Mr Fletcher has a duty to push the foreign giants harder and to rescue local content, local stories and local voices from the cons’ rip-off virus.”


World Nation News Desk
World Nation News Desk
World Nation News is a digital news portal website. Which provides important and latest breaking news updates to our audience in an effective and efficient ways, like world’s top stories, entertainment, sports, technology and much more news.
Latest news
Related news


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here