- Advertisement -spot_img
Saturday, July 2, 2022

The only gynecologist in the Senate is pushing misinformation about the abortion pill

Senator Tina Smith (D-Minn), a former executive director for planned parenting and a strong advocate for women’s reproductive rights, is outraged enough that the Supreme Court is appearing. ready to annul Roe v. Wade.

This was the case last week, during a hearing in the committee on the draft law on fees for users of the Food and Drug Administration, when Senator Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) Carelessly tried to change the law by requiring women to visit a doctor and go for an ultrasound before than being allowed to use the abortion pill, Smith was angry.

“Completely unnecessary,” she told him at a hearing on Tuesday.

“This amendment would force women seeking medical abortion to be diagnosed in person and only after this unnecessary procedure,” she said. “Let’s be clear, this kind of thing [transvaginal] Ultrasound has no medical purpose within 10 weeks of pregnancy, which is the time frame when women can have an abortion with medication.

Smith tweeted about it after the hearing, he also said that there was “zero” reason for Marshall’s proposal and accused him of “punishing women for seeking a joint medical procedure”.

That could have been the end. After all, Smith was right: abortion drugs, also called the abortion pill, were approved by the FDA in 2000. is safe, effective and widely prescribed for the care of abortion and abortion in the first 10 weeks. It is also the most common method of abortion in the country, which makes the eye 60% of all abortions.

As of December, women don’t even have to go to the office to get a two-pill regimen. The FDA waived the rule to allow doctors to prescribe it through telehealth consultations and mail it to patients in states where it is allowed by law. This was just before the March study revealed that abortion can be performed without ultrasound or physical examination, a study with far-reaching implications given thatUltrasound machines cost thousands of dollars and require specialized training.

But Marshall, who likes to say he’s the only gynecologist in the Senate, he tweeted to Smith – this time making a strange claim about the dangers of the abortion pill.

“Women will die if they skip this step,” Marshall said, referring to ultrasound, “and babies will be born with birth defects because the drug is less effective in later gestational age.”

Dying women! Babies with birth defects! This is outrageous!

Senator Tina Smith called Senator Roger Marshall for spreading “misinformation” about the abortion pill in order to try to scare women.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the main professional organization for gynecologists, responded to HuffPost’s request for comment almost immediately when asked about Marshall’s claims.

“ACOG does not support this statement,” said Kate Connors, a spokeswoman for the organization. “Drug abortion is safe and effective, and the evidence shows that it can be provided safely and efficiently through telehealth, let alone without ultrasound.

Connors also pointed out to HuffPost the ACOG’s official guidelines on abortion with drugs, which, for anyone interested in a medical explanation for what is happening, she said “discusses what he extrapolates wrong: misoprostol can be teratogenic in first trimester. However, the data show that dating the pregnancy after the last menstruation is sufficient to identify the patient who was indicated for abortion, so ultrasound is NOT necessary.

Smith, meanwhile, robbed her Republican counterpart of “pushing misinformation” about the safety of abortion with drugs, which are safer than Tylenol.

“Sen. Marshall is a gynecologist. He knows what the standard is, “she told HuffPost in a recent interview, accusing him of” hiding behind a doctorate “in an attempt to scare women away from safe abortions.

The Minnesota Democrat said it was important to note the context of Marshall’s claims.

“He’s doing it because he’s probably a few days away from the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, and many will turn to abortion with drugs as a way to approach abortion,” Smith said. “He’s also trying to make it harder … as we think about the future of abortion care where Roe v. Wade has been annulled.”

Senator Roger Marshall, A Gynecologist, Makes False Claims About The Safety Of Abortion With Drugs Just Weeks Or Even Days Before The Supreme Court Is Ready To Overturn Roe V. Wade.
Senator Roger Marshall, a gynecologist, makes false claims about the safety of abortion with drugs just weeks or even days before the Supreme Court is ready to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Tom Williams via Getty Images

Asked to comment in response to ACOG and Smith that his claims about abortion drugs were completely incorrect, a Marshall spokesman made a lengthy statement that the senator was a proud gynecologist.

“I will always be a gynecologist first,” Marshall said in an e-mail statement. “When I see political programs that will harm patients, it is my obligation to speak up.

The Kansas senator went on to claim that women who take the abortion pill without prior ultrasound “will lead to missed ectopic pregnancies and women [sic] dying. ” He also claimed that women without ultrasound would receive the pill after the approved period of 70 days, which, he said, could cause “significant birth defects, as well as delay prenatal care and higher rates of undiagnosed diabetes, blood clots and preeclampsia.” . ”

“As a gynecologist for 30 years, I gave birth to more than 5,000 babies, but I also treated patients with bleeding in the emergency room as a result of unsuccessful interruptions,” Marshall said, before reiterating his medical certificate. “As one of only four doctors in the US Senate and the only gynecologist, it is in the best interest of the safety and well-being of women and unborn children to request a medical examination before prescribing chemical abortion pills.

Once again, ACOG vehemently rejected Marshall’s claims.

The fact that Marshall uses the term “chemical abortion” at all is extremely inappropriate, Connors said, since ACOG explicitly called it “biased, non-clinical language.”

“If something is going to cost the lives of pregnant women, it will be a gross and deliberate misinterpretation of scientific data to limit access to abortion based on politics and ideology.”

– Dr. Jen Villavicencio from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

In addition, Dr. Jen Villavicencio, ACOG’s leader in capital transformation and a gynecologist specializing in complex family planning, said Marshall’s claims are completely dangerous for women.

“If something is going to cost the lives of pregnant women, it will be a gross and deliberate misinterpretation of scientific data to limit access to abortion based on politics and ideology,” Vilavisencio told HuffPost.

“As a doctor who is currently giving birth to babies, operating on people with life-threatening ectopic diseases and providing care for abortion, I can say that both policies and medical practice should reflect sound science and clear evidence,” she said. “The restrictions on abortion are obviously not supported by data. Abortion medication is a very safe, effective medical intervention and for many people, ultrasound only serves as a barrier to care.

The Supreme Court will end its term in the last week of June or the first week of July. He is expected to annul Roe against Wade by then.

World Nation News Desk
World Nation News Deskhttps://worldnationnews.com/
World Nation News is a digital news portal website. Which provides important and latest breaking news updates to our audience in an effective and efficient ways, like world’s top stories, entertainment, sports, technology and much more news.
Latest news
Related news
- Advertisement -


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here