The popular jury trial of the former director of Fafe Fernando Villan and its economic-financial director Ana Valls for the disbursement of 32,556 euros from the public treasury to different brothels has resumed this Monday with the deposition of the person in charge. UGT’s booth where the foundation allegedly paid for food during the April fair in 2008 was used to spend 2,000 euros at the Don Angelo brothel, according to the anti-corruption prosecutor’s office. However, the cassette player clarified that the invoice was not paid by Faf, although it appeared as the customer, but by the union. “I kept Faf because they told me at UGT Sevilla and they also gave me a sign of concept. Faf didn’t pay me anything, UGT Sevilla paid me via bank cheque,” he assured.
“I didn’t have Faf as a client. Then the challan will not be mine”, he later said, which has drawn logical questions from both the anti-corruption prosecutor and the magistrate presiding over the trial, Mercedes Alaya. To clarify whether the invoice shown was prepared by, “The invoice format is mine,” he replied at first. “I don’t remember making this invoice,” he later replied. In fact, he ended his testimony by saying that he did not remember whether he had received the money from Faf or not.
It is also a matter of doubt and doubt, Transfer of 514 with which Faf allegedly ended up paying for that meal The money in the booth was deposited in the account of another person who was a member of the UGT booth, although neither of the two witnesses has been able to specify that in 2008 they were partners or one was in charge of the booth and the other did his has helped.
Kester, for his part, has explained that all checks charged for his services in the booth were nominal and in his name. “I have come to know about that transfer now in trialWhen the Civil Guard showed me”, she added. Her then partner, intended recipient of the transferHe hasn’t clarified much: “I don’t remember it. If it is, it will be, but I don’t remember it.”
As Walsh explained at the trial, those responsible for Fafe attending that meal brought 2,000 euros in cash to the booth to pay for the ticket, but since the cost of the lunch was more than that amount, they paid it later. Transferred to. Difference. ,
The jury, as on Friday, was left this Monday without hearing live Don Angelo, the owner of the brothel where Villan spent more than 14,737 euros on the night of March 22-23, 2010. Jose RG could not be traced. But, at the request of the defendant’s own defence, the Chamber Yes, he will hear what he declared before the judge during investigation,
An auditor praises Faf’s internal controls
He has also appeared as witness and expert in this session. Auditor who was appointed by the general intervention of the Junta de Andalucia to review the accounts of the fife, “We were not aware of any incident in the treasury sector, I am not aware of any irregularities,” he said. His report on Faf was, in fact, “always favourable”, although he remarked that He didn’t check all the documents because that was “impossible”.as “the biggest foundation of the junta with assets of 100 million euros, 52 work centers and 1,800 workers”.
Therefore, the same witness has admitted that “It is not inconsistent” that he did not notice the irregularities with the fact that the Civil Guard found “lack of internal control”., “According to our audit, this control was quite satisfactory, but I do not know on what rules the Civil Guard is based,” he said.
(translate to tag) casetero